The honest pricing summary
AEO and AI-search optimization is an emerging Canadian service line in 2026. Standalone AEO retainers run C$2,500–C$10,000/month for focused work on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews citation visibility. Most established SEO agencies have folded AEO into their existing retainers without raising prices — which is the right approach because 70%+ of AEO work is high-quality SEO work re-applied. Standalone AEO is most useful for brands with mature SEO programs who want a focused citation-share lift, or for B2B brands targeting AI-search-heavy buyer audiences.
What you're actually paying for
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), and AI-search optimization are different names for the same discipline: optimizing content to be retrieved and cited by AI search engines — Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT search, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Bing Copilot.
Roughly 70% of the work overlaps with high-quality traditional SEO. Schema markup, topical authority, clear factual writing, and entity establishment all serve both classic search and AI-search retrieval. The remaining 30% is genuinely AEO-specific: lead-with-a-direct-answer formatting, query-fan-out coverage, llms.txt files, model-specific citation tactics, and citation-share measurement infrastructure.
AEO pricing models in 2026
The AEO services market is still settling on pricing in 2026. Three models dominate.
- Bundled into existing SEO retainer (no upcharge)How most established Canadian SEO agencies handle it. AEO becomes part of the standard scope without raising prices. Usually the right model for established SEO clients.
- AEO add-on to existing retainer (C$1,000–C$3,000/mo)Some agencies treat AEO as an upsell. Whether this is fair depends on what's being added — focused AEO content production, citation tracking infrastructure, and model-specific tactics genuinely require additional time.
- Standalone AEO retainer (C$2,500–C$10,000/mo)Specialist AEO agencies offering focused citation-share work without traditional SEO. Best for brands with mature SEO programs run elsewhere who want a separate focused AEO push.
AEO audit pricing and scope
A standalone AEO audit in Canada in 2026 runs C$3,500–C$15,000 depending on site size and depth. The scope should include the items below; pricing under C$3,500 typically reflects checklist-driven audits without real depth.
- Citation share baselineSample 25–100 priority queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and AI Overviews; measure current citation share by query and by competitor.
- Content gap analysisIdentify queries where competitors are cited and you're not. Map to specific content gaps and structural fixes.
- Schema and structured data auditReview entity definition, FAQ schema, Speakable schema, Article schema, and the @id graph for AI-readability.
- Crawl access auditVerify GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, OAI-SearchBot, Google-Extended, and others have appropriate access. Check for accidental blocks.
- Page-level format auditReview top 25–50 URLs against the 9 on-page citation tactics. Identify quick-win fixes.
- 90-day AEO roadmapPrioritized recommendations with effort estimates, expected citation-share lift, and measurement framework.
AEO retainer pricing
Monthly AEO retainers in Canada in 2026 sit in the C$2,500–C$10,000 range depending on scope and brand priority for AI-search visibility.
- Small AEO retainer (C$2,500–C$4,000/mo)AEO content production for 4–6 priority topics/month, schema upgrades on highest-value pages, monthly citation-share reporting on 25 priority queries.
- Mid-market AEO retainer (C$4,000–C$7,500/mo)Above plus query-fan-out coverage strategy, model-specific tactics for ChatGPT and Perplexity, llms.txt file management, monthly citation-share reporting on 50–100 queries.
- Enterprise AEO retainer (C$7,500–C$15,000+/mo)Above plus original research production, agentic-search readiness work, full @id graph development, brand-mention tracking across all major engines, quarterly executive reporting.
When standalone AEO makes sense vs bundled with SEO
For most Canadian SMBs and mid-market businesses, AEO bundled into existing SEO retainers is the right model. Treating AEO as a separate workstream usually creates duplicate effort and split reporting.
Standalone AEO makes sense in two scenarios. First, when a brand has a mature SEO program at one agency and wants to layer on a separate, focused AEO push from a specialist — typically because the existing SEO partner doesn't have the AEO depth. Second, when a brand's buyer audience skews heavily toward AI-search engines (B2B SaaS, technical professional services, research-driven categories), making AI-search citation share a strategically primary KPI worth its own dedicated investment.
Red flags in AEO pricing
- AEO 'guarantees' on citation ratesNo agency can guarantee citation share. Citation patterns shift weekly across all major engines as models update. Anyone guaranteeing specific citation results is either inexperienced or planning to manipulate measurement.
- Charging extra for schema work that should be standard SEOSchema markup is foundational SEO, not AEO. Agencies billing schema as a separate AEO upsell are double-charging for work that should be in the base SEO retainer.
- AEO programs without traditional SEO foundationAEO without traditional SEO is house-of-cards work. The retrieval system that selects sources for AI answers is substantially the classic search index. Sites with weak SEO fundamentals don't enter the candidate set in the first place.
- Low-cost 'llms.txt as a service' offeringsAn llms.txt file is a 30-minute job, not a service. Agencies billing recurring fees for llms.txt management are charging for work that should be a one-time deliverable.
- Vague reporting on citation shareReal AEO programs report citation share by query, by engine, over time — with the underlying query data available to you. 'AI visibility score' summary metrics without underlying data are usually marketing theatre.
Frequently Asked Questions
The questions Canadian operators ask before commissioning work.
