Toronto SEO for every service industry.
We don't do generic SEO. We build customized, high-performance campaigns tailored to the exact search behavior of your customers.
Don't see your industry?
We work with dozens of specialized niches not listed here. Contact our team to see if we're a fit for your specific business.
Contact Our TeamWhat our industry-page audits found
Findings from our internal 2025–2026 client audits and test sets. Methods and hedges shown for every claim.
Local-service pages that name the relevant regulator (LSO for Ontario law firms, RCDSO for dentists, CPSO for physicians) outperformed peers on LLM citation in our 2026 sample.
In our healthcare and legal audit set, pages naming a regulator in the visible body were cited on 51% of probed local queries vs. 28% for matched-topic pages without a named regulator.
Top-3 Map Pack appearances for high-intent Canadian queries correlate most strongly with primary-category match (r=0.71), review velocity over the trailing 90 days (r=0.62), and proximity (r=0.58) — in that order.
We ran a correlation study across 180 Canadian Map Pack rankings (six metros × five industries × six positional variants). Primary-category exact match remains the single largest factor; review velocity has overtaken raw review count since the late-2024 GBP signal weighting changes; proximity is still material but has demonstrably weakened year-over-year.
Canadian Google Business Profiles with 6+ owner-answered questions in the trailing 90 days had a measurable Map Pack ranking lift over zero-Q&A peers, controlling for review velocity.
Matched 36 Canadian GBP profiles into pairs by industry, review count, and review velocity. The owner-answered-Q&A cohort (median 9 answered Q's, 90 days) outranked the zero-Q&A cohort by a mean of 1.4 Map Pack positions across our probe set. Q&A velocity is currently the single most under-used GBP signal in our data.
Methodology: /methodology. Underlying queries and methods available on request.