Vertical B2B SaaS · Toronto, ON · serves North America + UK · 7 months (ongoing)

Head of Growth, Canadian B2B SaaS firm (Series B, ~80 employees, vertical SaaS)

A Series B Canadian vertical-SaaS firm was watching competitors get cited consistently in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews answers for its core category queries — while the client appeared in roughly 8% of probes. We ran a 7-month AEO/GEO program focused on direct-answer formatting, fact density, byline schema, and original-research publication.

Editorial note: Anonymized per our editorial policy. No fabricated client names or quotes. All metrics are directional and qualified with attribution; client-reported figures are labelled.

Service & engagement

Service
AEO/GEO program (LLM citation share lift)
Engagement length
7 months (ongoing)

The challenge

The client's category was being increasingly answered directly in AI engines rather than via traditional SERPs. Their internal team had measured citation share on a 50-query basket: client appeared in 8% of ChatGPT responses, 4% of Perplexity, 11% of Google AIO. The two largest competitors appeared in 60–80% of probes across the same engines. The marketing team had no playbook for AEO/GEO and was tempted to write it off as a fad.

Approach

  1. 1
    Established a baseline citation-share measurement across 50 category queries × 4 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews), tracked monthly throughout the engagement.
  2. 2
    Rewrote the top 30 highest-traffic pages to lead with explicit direct-answer paragraphs (3–5 sentences answering the query subject without pronoun openings), followed by structured detail.
  3. 3
    Added named-author bylines + Person JSON-LD across the content library, tied to a real bio page with credentials, publications, and external citations.
  4. 4
    Increased fact density to 3+ verifiable facts per 500 words across the top 30 pages — currency amounts, percentages, named regulators, durations, dates — replacing softer claims.
  5. 5
    Published two pieces of original research over months 3 and 5: hand-collected data from a 200-customer survey + an internal analytics study, both formatted with a methodology section, dataset summary, and Article + Dataset schema.
  6. 6
    Re-allowed and verified all major LLM crawlers in robots.txt (ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, GoogleOther) and shipped a clean llms.txt + llms-full.txt manifest at month 2.

Outcomes

approx. 8% → 47%
ChatGPT citation share (category queries)
monthly probe of fixed 50-query basket
approx. 4% → 52%
Perplexity citation share
monthly probe of fixed 50-query basket
approx. 11% → 38%
Google AI Overviews citation share
monthly probe of fixed 50-query basket
From near-zero to a meaningful trial source
Estimated AI-engine-sourced trial signups (M7 vs M0)
client-reported; UTM + referral attribution + survey

Reflection

AEO/GEO is no longer optional in categories where the AI engines are answering the query directly. The lever set is finite and specific: direct-answer formatting, fact density, byline schema, original research, and LLM crawler access. Programs that treat AEO as 'just write better content' don't move the citation-share needle; programs that systematically address the five levers move it within 90 days. The challenge is that classical-SEO ranking and AI-engine citation are now distinct disciplines — but the same content team can run both with a clear playbook.

AEOGEOB2B SaaSAI SearchOriginal Research

Want a similar engagement scoped to your business?

Every engagement starts with a 30-minute scoping call. We'll tell you whether the archetype above is a meaningful match for your situation, and if not, what we'd do differently.